Skip to main content

Evolutionary Biology, Perception, and Quantum Reality

By Anonymous
The Case Against Reality is an interview with neuroscientist, quantum physicist and professor at University of California, Irvine, Donald D. Hoffman regarding a study he published here. His argument is essentially that human beings did not evolve to perceive the world accurately, but rather, advantageously. He claims that what is advantageous to perceive may look nothing like "reality," provided an external reality exists at all. He goes so far as to posit an idealist metaphysic grounded in his studies in quantum cognitive science, claiming that a very possible structure of the world could be a network of first-person perspectives creating a pseudo-collective reality which we all experience together. What type of epistemic state would the explanations posited by Hoffman leave us in? On one hand, "truth" goes out the window, but on the other, we have immediate access to all the "objects" of our perceptions and, to some extent, create those "objects" ourselves.

Sources:
https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/04/the-illusion-of-reality/479559/
http://cogsci.uci.edu/~ddhoff/PerceptualEvolution.pdf

Related Work:
https://www.quantamagazine.org/20150604-quantum-bayesianism-qbism/

Donald D. Hoffman:
http://www.cogsci.uci.edu/~ddhoff/

Comments

  1. Anna VaughnMarch 6, 2017 at 7:15 AM

    This is awesome! By the way, this reasoning is quite similar to the rationale given by both Descartes and Locke that the chief function of the senses is to be a practical guide to aid us in survival.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Negative Afterimage

By Anonymous
Reber Shukri Professor Vaughn Negative afterimage is a stimulus which elicits a positive image. In order to experience this, one can look at a bright source of light and then look away to a dark area. The way negative afterimage works is when the eye's photo-receptors which are the rods and cones adapt to over stimulation and lose sensitivity. The photo-receptors which are constantly exposed to the same stimulus will fatigue their supply of photo pigment, resulting a decrease in signal to the brain. The way negative afterimage connects to perception is because of bottom up processing where the stimulus influences what we perceive. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=szy8iNCljlQ <Link to the video
Post a Comment
Read more

Illusions that Confuse Multiple Senses

By
In this video, several illusions are shown that deceive your senses. Illusions such as the Zöllner Illusion and the Poggendorff illusion confuse our bottom up processing by tricking our vision. However, our vision isn't the only sense that these illusions can confuse, blind individuals presented with raised versions of the same illusions are also confused by them. These illusions effect the visual and touch systems by confusing our bottom up processing by tricking out sight and touch. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Je1mkzRU5rc&t=64s
Post a Comment
Read more
By
          Evolution of Camouflage & First World War Dazzle Paint Jobs           The origins of modern camouflage owes itself to 19th century naturalist painters.  The most notable of these in the development of knowledge of camouflage was Abbot H, Thayer.  While he harbored some strange views of the scientific development of animal camouflage (all animals were "camouflaged")  He noticed the effect of disruptive patterning and countershading.  He noted that animal markings tended to obstruct their shape in nature.  Their coloring added with this made them often completely invisible. By going from darker shades on top to lighter on the bottom animals canceled out the way we see objects by light illuminated them top down.  Black also aided in disruptive schemes. An example of Countershading. Abbot's demonstration of disruptive patterns. In this image we can see how disruptive patterns observe...
Post a Comment
Read more