Skip to main content

Evolutionary Biology, Perception, and Quantum Reality

By Anonymous
The Case Against Reality is an interview with neuroscientist, quantum physicist and professor at University of California, Irvine, Donald D. Hoffman regarding a study he published here. His argument is essentially that human beings did not evolve to perceive the world accurately, but rather, advantageously. He claims that what is advantageous to perceive may look nothing like "reality," provided an external reality exists at all. He goes so far as to posit an idealist metaphysic grounded in his studies in quantum cognitive science, claiming that a very possible structure of the world could be a network of first-person perspectives creating a pseudo-collective reality which we all experience together. What type of epistemic state would the explanations posited by Hoffman leave us in? On one hand, "truth" goes out the window, but on the other, we have immediate access to all the "objects" of our perceptions and, to some extent, create those "objects" ourselves.

Sources:
https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/04/the-illusion-of-reality/479559/
http://cogsci.uci.edu/~ddhoff/PerceptualEvolution.pdf

Related Work:
https://www.quantamagazine.org/20150604-quantum-bayesianism-qbism/

Donald D. Hoffman:
http://www.cogsci.uci.edu/~ddhoff/

Comments

  1. Anna VaughnMarch 6, 2017 at 7:15 AM

    This is awesome! By the way, this reasoning is quite similar to the rationale given by both Descartes and Locke that the chief function of the senses is to be a practical guide to aid us in survival.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Typoglycemia and Predictive Coding

By
https://www.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/people/matt.davis/cmabridge/ This article was the basis of my presentation in class, but due to the 5 minute time limit I was only able to mention a fraction of the information. The page focuses on the original "copypasta" text: Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. He breaks this down sentence by sentence, first doing a quick search to see if there's actually research being done at Cambridge University on the topic (there's not). He lists a multitude of studies that are relevant to the orders of the letters, the impact these jumbles have on reading speed, and more. The article makes a strong case that we read wo
Post a Comment
Read more

The Brain's Fast and Slow Thinking

By
Our brain processes information through fast and slow thinking. During the first half of the semester we focused a lot on how we perceive information, and what is occurring in our brains as we are taking it all in. The video begins as it shows a basic contrast between fast and slow thinking. Something that would take a matter of seconds to draw a conclusion would be fast thinking, such as looking at a picture and analyzing the situation at hand. In contrast, a complex math problem would utilize slow thinking as our brains are working out the problem; it is not automatically known. The video emphasizes how our fast thinking is quick to make assumptions without looking deeply enough into a situation. It is up to us to let our conscious system (slow thinking) compensate and deeper analyze. This is seen with optical illusions. We need to use our conscious system to sort these illusions out for what they really are. Learning this importance of conscious thinking shows us that our first
Post a Comment
Read more