Skip to main content

Time Perception

The question of "does time pass" or what are the qualities of time passing is extremely interesting. In order to start looking at that concept time first has to be divided into "A Theory" and "B Theory". A theory states that past, present, and future do exist and time passes as it flows between them. B theory states there is no such thing as the past, present, and future or the passage of time and all time exists equally. 

A philosopher by the name of Simon Prosser has very interesting insight on the passage of time. He asks the question, "which one of your experiences is the experience of time passing?" This is interesting to think about, because for me and for everyone else you cannot pin point this experience. This is because experience does not happen all at once. He talks about a theory called the uniqueness constraint, which is that each one of your experiences matches up to some unique object in the world. So when you think of a banana, say the banana that you saw on the table this morning, your experience of that banana matches up to the object of the banana on the table and nothing else. So according to Prosser, because no experience you have of time matches up to the passage of time better than any other experience, you don't have an experience of time passing. 

Magical time measuring "Machine"
(Probably not what Prossor intend but fun nonetheless)
Prossor has also come up with a mind experiment called "the machine." He asks could we build a machine that detects the passage of time.  In an A universe it would detect something that indicated passing of time and alert us of that "something", but in a B universe it wouldn't detect that thing and we would know that time wasn't passing. But whatever the machine detected would be there whether the universe was A or B, and all of the same events would happen in both universes. In a way we already have that machine and it's our brain! So according to Prossor, we cannot detect the passage of time so any argument that relies on experience as proof must be wrong. But maybe there are different things happening in an A universe than in a B universe which would allow for the detection of time passing. So if Prossor is wrong and we can perceive time, our perception of time differs greatly. Here is a video as to why that is.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Typoglycemia and Predictive Coding

https://www.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/people/matt.davis/cmabridge/ This article was the basis of my presentation in class, but due to the 5 minute time limit I was only able to mention a fraction of the information. The page focuses on the original "copypasta" text: Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. He breaks this down sentence by sentence, first doing a quick search to see if there's actually research being done at Cambridge University on the topic (there's not). He lists a multitude of studies that are relevant to the orders of the letters, the impact these jumbles have on reading speed, and more. The article makes a strong case that we read wo

The Brain's Fast and Slow Thinking

Our brain processes information through fast and slow thinking. During the first half of the semester we focused a lot on how we perceive information, and what is occurring in our brains as we are taking it all in. The video begins as it shows a basic contrast between fast and slow thinking. Something that would take a matter of seconds to draw a conclusion would be fast thinking, such as looking at a picture and analyzing the situation at hand. In contrast, a complex math problem would utilize slow thinking as our brains are working out the problem; it is not automatically known. The video emphasizes how our fast thinking is quick to make assumptions without looking deeply enough into a situation. It is up to us to let our conscious system (slow thinking) compensate and deeper analyze. This is seen with optical illusions. We need to use our conscious system to sort these illusions out for what they really are. Learning this importance of conscious thinking shows us that our first

Phantom Limb Syndrome and the Mirror Box

        After seeing the rubber hand video, I started thinking about phantom limb syndrome which can occur after a person has an amputation. I found a video about a man who is missing an arm, yet "experiences" a sensation of pain in the place where his hand would be. The video explains how the brain does not really know that the limb is no longer there and so sends signals directed toward his hand, trying to clench it. If this man did have a hand, his muscles would send feedback to the brain telling him to slow down the motion, however since he has no hand, the brain sends more signals resulting in a positive feedback loop. The solution is a mirror box. The man places the hand he does have in a box with a mirror, and his hand is reflected so it looks as if he has two. The ultimately tricks the brain with visual feedback and relieves the pain felt. This illusion shows us how easily the brain can be deceived, and emphasizes how our sensations can be psychological.